SAC Minneapolis to SAC Seattle re contact with female subject, St. Cloud, Minnesota

Document date 3 January 1990

Part 49pages 425–4262 pagesDB Cooper-20586–20587

Also filed separately as sections:

Open in FBI Vault (Part 49, page 425 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-49:425-426

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-49:425-426

Document: Airtel SAC Minneapolis to SAC Seattle re contact with female subject, St. Cloud, Minnesota
Id: Cooper-Part-49:425-426
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A425-426

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 pp. 425–426 (DB Cooper-20586–20587), Airtel, dated 3 Jan 1990, serial SE 164-81-9073 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A425-426

FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 1/3/90

---

TO : SAC, SEATTLE FROM : SAC, MINNEAPOLIS (164A-SE-81) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJAK; AIRCRAFT HIJACKING OO: SEATTLE

Re Phoenix airtels to Minneapolis dated 5/12/89 and 10/4/89, and Minneapolis airtel to Phoenix dated 9/15/89.

Minneapolis Division contacted [REDACTED] DOB [REDACTED] and was unable to determine that she was not identical with [REDACTED] DOB [REDACTED]

On 12/4/89, [REDACTED] of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was contacted at her residence, [REDACTED] St. Cloud, Minnesota. [REDACTED] advised that she is one three children and that she [REDACTED] [REDACTED] born on [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] stated that her [REDACTED] is currently in the Las Vegas, Nevada, area and is again having [REDACTED] with her husband, [REDACTED] stated that the only person who would know her current address is [REDACTED] and that her telephone number is [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] stated that the only male in her family is her [REDACTED] and that at the time of the captioned hijacking he was only [REDACTED] years of age. The current

---

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

(2) - Seattle FILMED/NAG 1 - Minneapolis RFR:llm (3)

Approved: [signature] Transmitted ________ Per JAN 0 8 1990 (Number) (Time)

164A-81-9073 [SEARCHED __ INDEXED __] [SERIALIZED __ FILED __] [SEATTLE] DB Cooper-20586

MP 164A-SE-81

---

address of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Washington [REDACTED] He holds a valid Washington State driver's license which expires on [REDACTED] and describes him as a white male, 6' tall, brown eyes, DOB [REDACTED]

---

[REDACTED] had no additional information relevant to this investigation and appeared to be quite candid in her responses.

---

As stated in the above mentioned airtel, the birth dates and number of children listed for this family were verified at the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Vital Statistics, on 7/28/89.

---

Due to the fact that there are no members of this family who appear to match captioned subject, and that there are no outstanding leads within the Minneapolis Division, this case is RUC and no additional leads are being set out at this time.

---

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

2*

---

DB Cooper-20587

Serials: SE 164-81-9073