SAC Phoenix to SAC Minneapolis re woman believed to be sister of NORJAK subject

This copy: Part 49 p. 424Also filed at Part 8 p. 189 (primary) · Part 8 p. 190

This copy’s own title

SAC Phoenix to SAC Minneapolis re woman believed to be subject's sister

Document date 4 October 1989

Part 49page 4241 pageDB Cooper-20585

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 8 p. 189.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 49, page 424 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-49:424-424

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-49:424-424

Document: Airtel SAC Phoenix to SAC Minneapolis re woman believed to be subject's sister
Id: Cooper-Part-49:424-424
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A424-424

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 p. 424 (DB Cooper-20585), Airtel, dated 4 Oct 1989, serial SE 164-81-9076 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A424-424

FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS

Date 10/4/89

---

TO : SAC, MINNEAPOLIS

FROM : SAC, PHOENIX (164A-SE-0081) (P) [REDACTED] SUBJECT: NORJAK; AIRCRAFT HIJACKING; OO: SEATTLE

Re Phoenix airtel to Minneapolis, dated 5/12/89 and telcal between SA [REDACTED] Phoenix Division, and SA [REDACTED] Seattle Division, on 10/4/89.

Information provided telephonically to SA [REDACTED] by SA [REDACTED] Minneapolis Division, indicated a woman who may be [REDACTED] and the sister of D.B. COOPER may be living in the St. Paul, Minnesota area. The woman may have an outstanding traffic warrant, but local police would not serve their warrant because of her location outside of their jurisdiction. Therefore, indirect contact with the woman to obtain family information was not possible.

SA [REDACTED] concurs that direct contact should be made with this woman.

LEADS:

MINNEAPOLIS DIVISION AT ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA

Will obtain all identifying information on captioned woman in SA [REDACTED] investigation and make direct contact with her. Specific questioning is to be conducted regarding relatives and specifically any who may be D.B. COOPER. Specific responses from her are to be listed in the interview report, along with a separate recommendation from the interviewing agent regarding the candor exhibited during the interview.

---

3 - Minneapolis (1)- Seattle (Info) 2 - Phoenix AJT:ve (6) 1*

---

164A-81-9076 SEARCHED __ INDEXED __ SERIALIZED __ FILED __

OCT 1 3 1989

---

Approved: __________ Transmitted __________ (Number) (Time)

---

DB Cooper-20585

Serials: SE 164-81-9076

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.