SAC Phoenix to SAC Minneapolis re woman believed to be sister of NORJAK subject
This copy: Part 8 p. 190Also filed at Part 8 p. 189 (primary) · Part 49 p. 424
This copy’s own title
SAC Phoenix to SAC Minneapolis re NORJAK (duplicate copy)
Document date 4 October 1989
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 8 p. 189.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-08:190-190
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-08:190-190 Document: Airtel SAC Phoenix to SAC Minneapolis re NORJAK (duplicate copy) Id: Cooper-Part-08:190-190 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A190-190 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 8 p. 190 (DB Cooper-243), Airtel, dated 4 Oct 1989, serial 164A-SE-0081 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A190-190
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
TRANSMIT VIA: [X] AIRTEL [ ] Teletype [ ] Facsimile
PRECEDENCE: [ ] Immediate [ ] Priority [ ] Routine
CLASSIFICATION: [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] SECRET [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] UNCLAS E F T O [ ] UNCLAS
Date 10/4/89
---
TO : SAC, MINNEAPOLIS
FROM : SAC, PHOENIX (164A-SE-0081) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK; AIRCRAFT HIJACKING; OO: SEATTLE
Re Phoenix airtel to Minneapolis, dated 5/12/89 and telcal between SA [REDACTED] Phoenix Division, and SA [REDACTED] Seattle Division, on 10/4/89.
Information provided telephonically to SA [REDACTED] by SA [REDACTED] Minneapolis Division, indicated a woman who may be [REDACTED] and the sister of D.B. COOPER may be living in the St. Paul, Minnesota area. The woman may have an outstanding traffic warrant, but local police would not serve their warrant because of her location outside of their jurisdiction. Therefore, indirect contact with the woman to obtain [REDACTED] was not possible.
SA [REDACTED] concurs that direct contact should be made with this woman.
LEADS:
MINNEAPOLIS DIVISION AT ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
Will obtain all identifying information on captioned woman in SA [REDACTED] investigation and make direct contact with her. Specific questioning is to be conducted regarding relatives and specifically any who may be D.B. COOPER. Specific responses from her are to be listed in the interview report, along with a separate recommendation from the interviewing agent regarding the candor exhibited during the interview.
3 - Minneapolis 1 - Seattle (Info) (2)- Phoenix AJT:ve (6)
---
Approved: [signature] Searched________ Serialized________ Indexed________ Transmitted/Filed________(Number)________(Time) Per________
DB Cooper-243 164B SE 81-32
Serials: 164A-SE-0081, 164B SE 81-32
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.