SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject interview attempts, RUC
This copy: Part 49 p. 434Also filed at Part 49 p. 433 (primary)
This copy’s own title
SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Seattle re unsuccessful interview attempts (file copy)
Document date 29 January 1990
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 49 p. 433.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-49:434-434
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-49:434-434 Document: Airtel SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Seattle re unsuccessful interview attempts (file copy) Id: Cooper-Part-49:434-434 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A434-434 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 p. 434, Airtel, dated 29 Jan 1990, serial SE 164-81-9077 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A434-434
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS
Date 1/29/90
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-SE-81) FROM : SAC, SALT LAKE CITY (164A-SE-81)(RUC) SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: SE)
Re Seattle airtel to Salt Lake City dated 8/7/89; Salt Lake City airtel to Seattle dated 12/11/89.
Enclosed for Seattle Division are two copies of two inserts.
Numerous attempts from early September through December, 1989, to interview [REDACTED] regarding the captioned matter have been unsuccessful. Telephone number [REDACTED] [REDACTED] is a Provo unlisted number. Numerous telephonic contact attempts were conducted on various days at various hours without success.
On 12/8/89, the Salt Lake City Division telephonically contacted case Agent [REDACTED] of the Seattle Division regarding the difficulties involved with the [REDACTED] interview. SA [REDACTED] advised that, due to other investigative concerns, the Salt Lake City Division should not interview [REDACTED] until further advised by the Seattle Division.
The Salt Lake City Division considers this matter RUC until notified by the Seattle Division regarding further descriptive information on [REDACTED] and further instructions regarding the interview of [REDACTED]
---
2 - Seattle (Enc. 4) 1 - SU
JBM:krj (3) - 1* -
---
164-81-9077 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____
FEB 2 0 1990
Serials: SE 164-81-9077