SAC Oklahoma City to SAC Seattle re NORJAK lead
Document date 3 October 1990
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-50:115-115
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-50:115-115 Document: Airtel SAC Oklahoma City to SAC Seattle re NORJAK lead Id: Cooper-Part-50:115-115 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A115-115 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 50 p. 115 (DB Cooper-20715), Airtel, dated 3 Oct 1990, serial SE 164-81-9127 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A115-115
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 10/3/90
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-244) FROM : SAC, OKLAHOMA CITY (164A-OC-49813) (RUC) SUBJECT: NORJAK CAA - HIJACKING (A) OO: SEATTLE
---
Sus J. Misc. [guess: persons] CLENT OF [illegible] WANTS [guess: REWARY] b6 b7C
---
On 7/19/90, [REDACTED] Atoka, Oklahoma, contacted the Durant FBI, stating that a client of his (name refused) had information regarding above-captioned case. The client wished to remain anonymous but could provide information on the case, to include the identity of D. B. COOPER, his whereabouts and the location of a portion of the money.
The unidentified client refused to disseminate any information until he was sure he would receive a substantial reward for the information.
---
On 8/17/90, [REDACTED] was told that the reward offered was a percentage of the money returned. [REDACTED] advised that his client was only interested in a large sum of money, and as most of the money was already spent by D. B. COOPER that he does not feel that his client will come forth with any pertinent information.
[REDACTED] has since refused to return telephone calls made to his office and has not contacted the FBI since 8/17/90.
---
Inasmuch as no pertinent information was obtained and witness refused to cooperate with the investigation this matter is considered closed.
---
②- Seattle 1 - Oklahoma City RJWO/em (3)
---
1* /64A-81-9127 Approved: [signature] Transmitted __________ Per (Number) (Time) SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED _____ [illegible] [guess: cooper-20715]
Serials: 164-244, SE 164-81-9127
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.