SAC Oklahoma City to SAC Seattle re NORJAK lead
Document date 3 October 1990
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-69:074-074
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-69:074-074 Document: Airtel SAC Oklahoma City to SAC Seattle re NORJAK lead Id: Cooper-Part-69:074-074 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A074-074 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 69 p. 74 (DB Cooper-29369), Airtel, dated 3 Oct 1990 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A074-074
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS
Date 10/3/90
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-244) FROM : SAC, OKLAHOMA CITY (164A-OC-49813) (RUC) SUBJECT: NORJAK CAA - HIJACKING (A) OO: SEATTLE
---
On 7/19/90, [REDACTED], Atoka, Oklahoma, contacted the Durant FBI, stating that a client of his (name refused) had information regarding above-captioned case. The client wished to remain anonymous but could provide information on the case, to include the identity of D. B. COOPER, his whereabouts and the location of a portion of the money.
---
The unidentified client refused to disseminate any information until he was sure he would receive a substantial reward for the information.
---
On 8/17/90, [REDACTED] was told that the reward offered was a percentage of the money returned. [REDACTED] advised that his client was only interested in a large sum of money, and as most of the money was already spent by D. B. COOPER that he does not feel that his client will come forth with any pertinent information.
---
[REDACTED] has since refused to return telephone calls made to his office and has not contacted the FBI since 8/17/90.
---
Inasmuch as no pertinent information was obtained and witness refused to cooperate with the investigation this matter is considered closed.
---
② - Seattle 1 - Oklahoma City (3)
1*
Approved: __________ Transmitted __________ Per __________ (Number) (Time)
SUBJ [stamp] W4A-81-9127 SEARCHED ______ INDEX ______ SERIALIZED ______ FILE ______ OCT 0 91990 Fci: Sul.
---
DB Cooper-29369
Serials: 164-244
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.