To SAC Seattle re Denver airtel 10/2/90 interview discrepancies; suspect not to be considered
Title revised to match the document’s own text.
Original title: Memo to SAC Seattle re Denver airtel 10/2/90 interview discrepancies eliminating suspect
Document date 10 June 1992
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-50:250-251
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-50:250-251 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re Denver airtel 10/2/90 interview discrepancies; suspect not to be considered Id: Cooper-Part-50:250-251 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A250-251 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 50 pp. 250–251 (DB Cooper-20939–20940), Memo, dated 10 Jun 1992, serial SE 164-81-9170 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A250-251
Memorandum
To : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-SE-81) (P) Date 6/10/92
From : SA [REDACTED]
Subject: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
Re SUB J, MISCELLANEOUS PERSONS: [REDACTED] SOURCE.
Re Denver airtel to Seattle dated 10/2/90.
In the interview of [REDACTED] the following discrepancies were noted that would indicate [REDACTED] [REDACTED] should not be considered as a suspect in this matter:
1. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] used the name D. B. COOPER at the of the hijacking because [REDACTED] [REDACTED] It is noted that UNSUB did not use the name D. B. COOPER in this hijacking.
2. [REDACTED] said that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] in order to avoid drawing attention. It is assumed by this that she is alleging that [REDACTED] was pretending to be a hunter and thereby escape detection. It is clear from the events of the hijacking that UNSUB did not care where the airplane went as long as it went south of the Seattle area. UNSUB would have no way of knowing where he was going to land and, therefore, probably did not contemplate finding anything that he had left on the ground when he landed there.
---
(2) - Seattle RNN/khc (2) [REDACTED]
164A-81-9170 SEARCHED __ INDEXED __ SERIALIZED __ FILED __
JUN 1 0 1992 FBI-SEATTLE
---
DB Cooper-20939
164A-SE-81
---
3. [REDACTED] stated that after [REDACTED] was jailed for a previous crime [REDACTED] and one of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] used in the hijacking. UNSUB in this matter was not [REDACTED] nor did he use one in the hijacking. He also did not display an [REDACTED] of any kind during the hijacking that was noted by the stewardesses who were with him continuously for over six hours.
---
4. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] had always been disappointed that the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] UNSUB in this matter jumped out of the rear air stairs of a 727 and, therefore, it would have been impossible for him to [REDACTED]
---
5. [REDACTED] describes [REDACTED] as a White male, born [REDACTED]. UNSUB in this matter was described in his mid 40s. [REDACTED] would have been [REDACTED] years old at the time of the hijacking.
---
In view of the above information, it does not appear likely that [REDACTED] is involved in captioned crime.
No further investigation will be conducted concerning him.
---
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
DB Cooper-20940
---
2*
Serials: SE 164-81-9170