To SAC Seattle re discrepancies indicating individual should not be considered a NORJAK suspect
Title revised to match the document’s own text.
Original title: Memo to SAC Seattle re interview discrepancies eliminating individual as NORJAK suspect
Document date 10 June 1992
Part of: To SAC Seattle re Denver airtel 10/2/90 interview discrepancies; suspect not to be considered
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-69:050-050
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-69:050-050 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re discrepancies indicating individual should not be considered a NORJAK suspect Id: Cooper-Part-69:050-050 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A050-050 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 69 p. 50, Memo, dated 10 Jun 1992, serial 104-81-0170 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A050-050
Memorandum
To : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-SE-81) (P) Date 6/10/92 From : SA [REDACTED] Subject: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
Re SUB J, MISCELLANEOUS PERSONS: [REDACTED] [REDACTED] - SOURCE.
Re Denver airtel to Seattle dated 10/2/90.
In the interview of [REDACTED], the following discrepancies were noted that would indicate [REDACTED] [REDACTED] should not be considered as a suspect in this matter:
1. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] used the name D. B. COOPER at the of the hijacking because [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] It is noted that UNSUB did not use the name D. B. COOPER in this hijacking.
2. [REDACTED], said that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] in order to avoid drawing attention. It is assumed by this that she is alleging that [REDACTED] was pretending to be a hunter and thereby escape detection. It is clear from the events of the hijacking that UNSUB did not care where the airplane went as long as it went south of the Seattle area. UNSUB would have no way of knowing where he was going to land and, therefore, probably did not contemplate finding anything that he had left on the ground when he landed there.
---
Seattle [REDACTED] (2)
SUBJ 104A-81-0170 SEARCHED / SERIALIZED JUN 1 0 1992 FBI-SEATTLE
Serials: 104-81-0170