Part 69, page 50

Document date 10 June 1992

Open in FBI Vault (Part 69, page 50 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 69 p. 50, Memo, dated 10 Jun 1992, serial 104-81-0170 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-69/pages/50

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

Memorandum

To : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-SE-81) (P) Date 6/10/92 From : SA [REDACTED] Subject: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

---

Re SUB J, MISCELLANEOUS PERSONS: [REDACTED] [REDACTED] - SOURCE.

Re Denver airtel to Seattle dated 10/2/90.

In the interview of [REDACTED], the following discrepancies were noted that would indicate [REDACTED] [REDACTED] should not be considered as a suspect in this matter:

1. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] used the name D. B. COOPER at the of the hijacking because [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] It is noted that UNSUB did not use the name D. B. COOPER in this hijacking.

2. [REDACTED], said that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] in order to avoid drawing attention. It is assumed by this that she is alleging that [REDACTED] was pretending to be a hunter and thereby escape detection. It is clear from the events of the hijacking that UNSUB did not care where the airplane went as long as it went south of the Seattle area. UNSUB would have no way of knowing where he was going to land and, therefore, probably did not contemplate finding anything that he had left on the ground when he landed there.

---

Seattle [REDACTED] (2)

SUBJ 104A-81-0170 SEARCHED / SERIALIZED JUN 1 0 1992 FBI-SEATTLE

AI notes

Commentary by the AI model that transcribed this page. It may bring in context the page itself does not state. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

FBI internal memorandum header addressed to SAC Seattle regarding NORJAK case, dated 6/10/92, from a redacted Special Agent. The memo discusses discrepancies found in an interview that indicate a redacted individual should not be considered a suspect in the NORJAK hijacking. Key points: (1) the individual reportedly used the name D.B. Cooper in connection with the hijacking, but the actual UNSUB did not use that name; (2) allegations that the individual was pretending to be a hunter to avoid detection, but the UNSUB could not have known where he would land and likely did not plan to retrieve anything left on the ground. Distribution and filing stamps showing the document was searched, serialized, and filed at FBI-Seattle on June 10, 1992.

Multiple redaction blocks throughout the document (b6, b7C, b7D exemptions)
Text is clear typewritten content

Part 69, page 50

People

Places

Dates mentioned

Transcript