Nitel SAC Philadelphia re confidential informant offering NORJAK information
Document date 9 March 1972
Also filed at: Part 109 pp. 146–147
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-56:192-194
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-56:192-194 Document: Nitel SAC Philadelphia re confidential informant offering NORJAK information Id: Cooper-Part-56:192-194 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-56%3A192-194 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 56 pp. 192–194 (DB Cooper-23593–23595), Teletype, dated 9 Mar 1972, serial LA 164-497-332 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-56%3A192-194
NR001 PH CODE 329 AM NITEL 3-9-72 DCC TO DIRECTOR SEATTLE LOS ANGELES FROM PHILADELPHIA
---
NORJAK; CAS - HIJACKING; EXTORTION. OO: SEATTLE.
RE PH TEL CALL TO SEATTLE AND [REDACTED] b6 [REDACTED] TELEPHONICALLY b7C b7D ADVISED SA [REDACTED] ON THREE EIGHT SEVENTYTWO, THAT HE THOUGHT HE HAD INFORMATION REGARDING CAPTIONED CASE AND WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THE REWARD WOULD BE. CI CALLED FROM [REDACTED] CALIFORNIA. HE WAS TOLD THAT REWARD WOULD BE SUBSTANTIAL IF CASE SOLVED. HE RELATED FOLLWING STORY: [REDACTED] AND OTHER THINGS b6 TOLD HIM [REDACTED] b7C [REDACTED] HE WENT THROUGH [REDACTED] b7D [REDACTED]
HE WOULD TELL CI NOTHING FURTHER, BUT CI KEPT PRYING. HE TOLD CI [REDACTED] [REDACTED] AND WOULD MAKE NO FURTHER COMMENT. END PAGE ONE
---
164-497-332 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED 13 MAR 9 1972 GELES [illegible]
---
DB Cooper-23593
PAGE TWO
---
CI QUESTIONED HIM FURTHER, AND [REDACTED] [REDACTED] CI ASKED IF THE SUBJECT WAS [REDACTED] AND [REDACTED] SAID NOM CI ASKED IF THE SUBJECT WAS [REDACTED] [REDACTED] AND [REDACTED] SAID NOM CI THEN ASKED IF THE SUBJECT WAS [REDACTED] [REDACTED] AND [REDACTED] SAID, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] SAID HE [REDACTED] [REDACTED] SAID [REDACTED] [REDACTED] TOLD CI [REDACTED] CI'S OPINION IS THAT [REDACTED]
---
CI STATED WILL TRY TO CONTACT [REDACTED] FOR ADDITIONAL INFO IN THE PM OF THREE EIGHT SEVENTYTWO. CI STATED [REDACTED] HAS NEVER LIED TO HIM IN THE PAST, AND JUST DID NOT WANT TO RELATE STORY.
---
CI ASKED HIM IF HE [REDACTED] [REDACTED] AND [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
END PAGE TWO
---
DB Cooper-23594
PAGE THREE
---
CI DID NOT WANT TO CONTACT AGENTS IN LOS ANGELES, BUT STATED HE WILL IF IT IS NECESSARY. HE WAS ADVISED THAT IT WOULD BE NECESSARY. [REDACTED] CI HAS ALWAYS FURNISHED RELIABLE INFORMATION IN THE PAST. HE DOES NOT BELIEVE [REDACTED]
LOS ANGELES TELEPHONICALLY FURNISHED WITH NAME, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND ADDRESS OF SOURCE THIS DATE. SOURCE REQUESTED THAT HE BE CONTACTED FIRST BY TELEPHONE BY LA AGENT AND THAT CONTACT NOT BE MADE PRIOR TO NINE THIRTY AM, LA TIME, MARCH NINE INSTANT.
LOS ANGELES CONTACT SOURCE OBTAIN ALL INFORMATION ON HIS POSESSION RE [REDACTED] THIS CASE AND THEREAFTER INTERVIEW [REDACTED] TO ESTABLISH WHETHER ANY TRUTH TO HIS STORY. BU AND SEATTLE SHOULD BE ADVISED OF RESULTS. -P-
END
---
DB Cooper-23595
---
b6 b7C b7D
Serials: LA 164-497-332