ASAC Paul R. Bibler to SAC Seattle re Army public affairs Q&A on troop participation
This copy: Part 65 p. 343Also filed at Part 24 p. 70 (primary) · Part 63 p. 194
This copy’s own title
ASAC Paul R. Bibler to SAC Seattle re Army Public Affairs Q&A on search assistance
Document date 17 March 1972
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 24 p. 70.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-65:343-343
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-65:343-343 Document: Memo ASAC Paul R. Bibler to SAC Seattle re Army Public Affairs Q&A on search assistance Id: Cooper-Part-65:343-343 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-65%3A343-343 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 65 p. 343 (DB Cooper-27645), Memo, dated 17 Mar 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-65%3A343-343
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) DATE: 3/17/72
FROM : ASAC PAUL R. BIBLER
SUBJECT: NORJAK
---
Assistant Director BATES called from Division6. He said that they had a call from the Public Affairs Officer of the Army.
The Army is sending out to their Public Affairs officers in the field certain questions and answers which they anticipate using in connection with publicity in regard to the search.
Question 1: Is the Army assisting the FBI in its search for a sky jacker? Answer: Yes. At the request of the FBI approximately 200 U. S. Army troops from Ft.Lewis are assisting in the search for a sky jacker, believed to have parachuted in the vicinity of Portland, Oregon, on the 24th of November 1971. There is a possibility this sky jacker could have died in his jump. (The Bureau suggested to the Army that they change Portland to LaCenter, Washington)
Question No. 2 relates purely to the justification for the U. S. Army, which is supposed to be defending this country, being used in a situation like this and in answer to it the Army [guess: said] they feel it is justified since kh it came at the request of a responsible government agency and is related to their training program.
BATES did not give me this verbatim since we would not be concerned with it.
[guess: Then] No. 3 is another Army question which raises is such support legal and the Army answer is Yes.
BATES suggests that we make no comment other than to say, Yes, the Army is assisting us in the search and we have no further comment.
---
Sub E 164-81 - 2653[?] SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _/[illegible] FILED _/[illegible] MAR 3 1972 FBI — SEATTLE
---
DB Cooper-27645
Serials: SE 164-81