SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle re D.B. Cooper description request
Document date 20 November 1979
Part of: SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject description request of 7/23/79
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-68:079-079
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-68:079-079 Document: Airtel SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle re D.B. Cooper description request Id: Cooper-Part-68:079-079 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A079-079 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 68 p. 79 (DB Cooper-28798), Airtel, dated 20 Nov 1979, serial 164-0-172 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A079-079
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78) FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 11/20/79
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE FROM: AC, ATLANTA (164-0-172) (SQ 2)
D.B. COOPER CAA OO: SEATTLE
Re Atlanta airtel, 7/23/79.
Referenced airtel requested description of subject, his photo and summary of violation.
To date Atlanta Office has no record of having received answer to referenced airtel.
LEADS
SEATTLE
Furnish Atlanta information requested.
---
(2) - Seattle 1 - Atlanta (3)
---
[handwritten stamp: SUBJ] [handwritten annotation near top right, partially illegible: [guess: Surv] Hq] [bottom right stamps: SUBJ] [number/date stamp partially legible: 164-[illegible]-9149]
---
b6 b7C
DB Cooper-28798
---
Approved: ______________ · Transmitted ______________ Per ______________ (Number) (i, a)
Serials: 164-0-172
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.