SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle following up prior request for Cooper description and photo
Document date 20 November 1979
Part of: SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject description request of 7/23/79
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-76:127-127
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-76:127-127 Document: Airtel SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle following up prior request for Cooper description and photo Id: Cooper-Part-76:127-127 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-76%3A127-127 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 76 p. 127 (DB Cooper-33157), Airtel, dated 20 Nov 1979, serial 164-0-172 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-76%3A127-127
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78) FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☐ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 11/20/79
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE FROM: AC, ATLANTA (164-0-172) (SQ 2) D.B. COOPER CAA OO: SEATTLE
Re Atlanta airtel, 7/23/79.
Referenced airtel requested description of subject, his photo and summary of violation.
To date Atlanta Office has no record of having received answer to referenced airtel.
LEADS
SEATTLE
Furnish Atlanta information requested.
---
[Handwritten] SUB: HH [Handwritten] SUBJ [Handwritten] SUR-HH [Stamp/date] [illegible] 5/ -[illegible] b6 b7C
---
(2) - Seattle (1) - Atlanta (3)
Approved: _______________ Transmitted _______________ Per: _______________ (Number) (Time) DB Cooper-33157
Serials: 164-0-172
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.