SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re Fresno interview
Document date 3 December 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-68:141-141
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-68:141-141 Document: Airtel SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re Fresno interview Id: Cooper-Part-68:141-141 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A141-141 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 68 p. 141 (DB Cooper-28899), Airtel, dated 3 Dec 1976, serial SE 164-81-7233 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A141-141
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
FBI
Date: 12/3/76
Transmit the following in ________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Precedence)
---
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) SAC, SACRAMENTO (164-50) (P)
ACT: NORJAC OO: Seattle
---
Re telephone call of SA [REDACTED], Fresno, California Resident Agency to SA [REDACTED], Seattle Division, 11/30/76.
Enclosed for Seattle are two copies of an FD-302 reflecting interview of [REDACTED]. Original FD-302 will be forwarded under separate cover.
On 11/26/76, [REDACTED] telephonically contacted the Fresno, California RA, and advised that he had seen recent publicity concerning the five-year anniversary of the D. B. COOPER hijacking incident, which prompted him to contact the FBI and relate a suspicious incident which he witnessed near Ellensburg, Washington, on the same night as the skyjacking.
Arrangements were made to interview [REDACTED] on 11/30/76.
On 11/30/76, the information contained in the enclosed FD-302 was discussed with SA [REDACTED], Case Agent, Sacramento Division, and it was ascertained from this conver- sation that due to an approximate 60-mile difference in geographical location, it would be very doubtful that this incident had any relation to captioned matter.
This information is being provided to Seattle for whatever further investigation is deemed appropriate.
---
SubJ 164-81-7233 SEA [illegible] SERIALIZED [illegible] FBI—SEATTLE
---
(2) - Seattle (Enc.-2) [REDACTED] 2 - Sacramento (4)
Approved: _________ Special Agent in Charge Sent _______ M Per _______
---
DB Cooper-28899
Serials: SC 164-50, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7233
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.