SAC Charlotte to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, Winston-Salem look-alike (file copy)
This copy: Part 69 p. 138Also filed at Part 44 p. 177 (primary)
This copy’s own title
SAC Charlotte to SAC Seattle enclosing FD-302 and interview notes re NORJAK
Document date 2 May 1980
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 44 p. 177.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Part of: SAC Charlotte to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing FD-302 on Winston-Salem look-alike
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-69:138-138
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-69:138-138 Document: Airtel SAC Charlotte to SAC Seattle enclosing FD-302 and interview notes re NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-69:138-138 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A138-138 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 69 p. 138 (DB Cooper-29470), Airtel, dated 2 May 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A138-138
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 5/2/80
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, CHARLOTTE (164-219) (P) Sub J
NORJAK
Enclosed for Seattle are the following items:
Original and five copies of an FD-302 regarding [REDACTED]
Two pages torn from [REDACTED].
Agent's notes regarding the [REDACTED] interview.
[REDACTED] said she had spoken with [REDACTED] regarding the information set forth in the enclosed FD-302 and [REDACTED] had told her not to contact the FBI. Therefore, [REDACTED] requested that if any future contacts by the FBI are necessary, the contacting agent not identify himself to anyone other than herself.
Seattle is requested to review the enclosed FD-302 and thereafter set forth leads if deemed appropriate.
---
LEAD:
CHARLOTTE
AT WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
A telephone call was received at the Greensboro, North Carolina, Resident Agency to the effect that [REDACTED]
---
SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED MAY 8 1980 FBI - SEATTLE
---
② Seattle (Encs. 9)[REDACTED] 2 Charlotte [REDACTED] (4)
Approved __________ Transmitted __________ Per __________ (Number) (Time) DB Cooper-29470
Serials: CE 164-219, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.