Charlotte to Seattle re NORJAK suspect lead
Document date 2 May 1980
Part of: SAC Charlotte to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, Winston-Salem look-alike (file copy)
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-97:234-234
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-97:234-234 Document: Airtel Charlotte to Seattle re NORJAK suspect lead Id: Cooper-Part-97:234-234 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-97%3A234-234 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 97 p. 234 (DB Cooper-43770), Airtel, dated 2 May 1980, serial CE 164-219-4 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-97%3A234-234
x AIRTEL
---
5/2/80
---
TO: SAC SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, CHARLOTTE (164-219) (P) NORJAK
---
Enclosed for Seattle are the following items:
Original and five copies of an FD 302 regarding [REDACTED]
Two pages torn from [REDACTED].
Agent's notes regarding the [REDACTED] interview.
-- [REDACTED] said she had spoken with [REDACTED] regarding the information set forth in the enclosed FD 302 and [REDACTED] had told her not to contact the FBI. Therefore [REDACTED] requested that if any future contacts by the FBI are necessary, the contacting agent not identify himself to anyone other than herself.
Seattle is requested to review the enclosed FD-302 and thereafter set forth leads if deemed appropriate.
---
LEAD.
CHARLOTTE
AT WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
A telephone call was received at the Greensboro, North Carolina Resident Agency to the effect that DARROLD OESTREICH
---
2 Seattle (Encs. 9) (2) Charlotte (4) [REDACTED]
164-219-4
SEARCHED ___ INDEXED ___ SERIALIZED ___ FILED ___
[signature: illegible, possibly "miller" or similar]
---
DB Cooper-43770
Serials: CE 164-219, CE 164-219-4, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.