SAC Norfolk to Acting Director re Langley AFB interviews

This copy: Part 74 p. 228Also filed at Part 65 p. 237 (primary)

This copy’s own title

SAC Norfolk to Acting Director re NORJAK parachute/equipment inquiry

Document date 9 November 1972

Part 74page 2281 pageDB Cooper-32139

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 65 p. 237.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Part of: SAC Norfolk to Acting Director re NORJAK interviews and aerial photography proposal · 9 November 1972 · Part 28 pp. 402–403

Open in FBI Vault (Part 74, page 228 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-74:228-228

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-74:228-228

Document: Airtel SAC Norfolk to Acting Director re NORJAK parachute/equipment inquiry
Id: Cooper-Part-74:228-228
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-74%3A228-228

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 74 p. 228 (DB Cooper-32139), Airtel, dated 9 Nov 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-74%3A228-228

Sub E Sub F Seib X

---

11/9/72

Airtel

TO: ACTING DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) FROM: SAC, NORFOLK (164-41) (RUC)

NORJAK

(OO: Seattle)

Re Seattle airtel to Bureau 11/1/72.

On 11/7/72, interviews were conducted with the following individuals assigned to the [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Langley Air Force Base, Virginia:

[REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

---

It was the consensus of opinion among the three individuals above, each of whom has had considerable experience with infrared imagery, that efforts to locate the attache case by this means would probably prove futile. The terrain, as described, would neutralize any effort, particularly if tall trees and mountains are part of its makeup. Further explained was the necessity for the presence of heat which would need to be generated by the object (attache case) in contrast to the surrounding terrain for successful infrared high resolution photography. The size of the attache case provides a poor target for any type of aerial photography, including visual photography.

---

2 - Bureau (2)- Seattle (164-81) 1 - Norfolk

(5)

11/1-81 - 4405 SEARCHED ...........INDEXED........... SERIALIZED...........FILED................ NOV 1 3 1972

DB Cooper-32139

Serials: 164-2111, PD 164-41, SE 164-81