SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re interview at Prescott, Oregon

Document date 6 June 1972

Part 94page 3161 pageDB Cooper-42379

Open in FBI Vault (Part 94, page 316 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-94:316-316

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-94:316-316

Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re interview at Prescott, Oregon
Id: Cooper-Part-94:316-316
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-94%3A316-316

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 94 p. 316 (DB Cooper-42379), Airtel, dated 6 Jun 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-94%3A316-316

6/6/72

AIRTAL AIRMAIL

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK

---

Re Seattle airtel to Portland, 5/26/72.

On 6/6/72, [REDACTED], located at [REDACTED], Prescott, Oregon, advised [REDACTED] is an employee of [REDACTED] worked for approximately seven months at the site of [REDACTED], [REDACTED], Prescott, Oregon, however, [REDACTED] has since been transfered to [REDACTED] project located at [REDACTED], Tacoma, Washington. [REDACTED] is unable to verify dates of [REDACTED] employment because all of his employment records have been transfered to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] work site. [REDACTED] was, therefore, unable to establish if [REDACTED] was employed at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] site at the time of the NORJAK incident.

---

LEAD

SEATTLE

AT TACOMA, WASHINGTON. Will contact [REDACTED] [REDACTED] work site, and determine if [REDACTED] was working at the time of the NORJAK incident in an attempt to eliminate him as a suspect in this matter.

---

2 - Seattle [REDACTED] - Portland

CLH:sag [REDACTED]

---

b6 b7C [illegible stamps] DB Cooper-42379

Serials: PD 164-41, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.