SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re Prescott, Oregon source on suspect's employment
Document date 8 June 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-110:369-369
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-110:369-369 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re Prescott, Oregon source on suspect's employment Id: Cooper-Part-110:369-369 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-110%3A369-369 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 110 p. 369 (DB Cooper-5000), Airtel, dated 8 Jun 1972, serial SE 164-81-3482 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-110%3A369-369
6/6/72
---
AIRTAL AIRMAIL
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P) SUBJECT: NORJAK
Re Seattle airtel to Portland, 5/26/72.
On 6/6/72, [REDACTED] located at [REDACTED], Prescott, Oregon, advised [REDACTED] is an employee of [REDACTED] worked for approximately seven months at the site of [REDACTED], Prescott, Oregon, however, [REDACTED] has since been transferred to [REDACTED] project located at [REDACTED] Tacoma, Washington, [REDACTED] is unable to verify dates of [REDACTED] employment because all of his employment records have been transferred to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] work site. [REDACTED] was, therefore, unable to establish if [REDACTED] was employed at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] site at the time of the NORJAK incident.
---
LEAD
SEATTLE
AT TACOMA, WASH[INGTON]. Will contact [REDACTED] work site, and determine if GARZA was working at the time of the NORJAK incident in an attempt to eliminate him as a suspect in this matter.
---
2 - Seattle 2 - Portland
CLH:mag (4)
---
164-81-3482 SEARCHED......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED /m FILED /m JUN 08 1972 FBI - SEATTLE [initials]
---
DB COOPER 5000[7]
Serials: PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3482
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.