SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, enclosing Washington driver's license photo

This copy: Part 95 pp. 183–184Also filed at Part 29 pp. 334–335 (primary)

This copy’s own title

SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re interview at University of Oregon, Eugene, of NORJAK look-alike witness

Document date 12 January 1973

Part 95pages 183–1842 pagesDB Cooper-42584–42585

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 29 pp. 334–335.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 95, page 183 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-95:183-184

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-95:183-184

Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re interview at University of Oregon, Eugene, of NORJAK look-alike witness
Id: Cooper-Part-95:183-184
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-95%3A183-184

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 95 pp. 183–184 (DB Cooper-42584–42585), Airtel, dated 12 Jan 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-95%3A183-184

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 1/12/73

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Priority)

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41)(P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK Re: [REDACTED] (OO: Seattle)

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

Re Seattle airtel to Portland, 1/4/73.

Enclosed for Seattle is copy of Washington driver's license with photograph of [REDACTED].

The following investigation was conducted by SA [REDACTED] at Eugene, Oregon:

On 1/11/73, [REDACTED], University of Oregon (UO), telephone [REDACTED], was interviewed at the UO Law School.

[REDACTED] was shown the photograph of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and after viewing the photograph at length, [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] strongly resembles the individual who claimed to have found part of the D. B. COOPER ransom money. [REDACTED] stated that the individual claiming to have part of the ransom money strongly resembles [REDACTED] however, his hair appeared somewhat different than [REDACTED].

---

2 - Seattle (Enc. 1) 2 - Portland

LKE:csa (4)

164-41 - 1/[illegible] [Initials]

Searched _______ Serialized _______ Indexed _______ Filed _______

DB Cooper-42584

---

Approved: ___________ Sent _________ M Per _________ Special Agent in Charge ★U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574

PD 164-41

---

as the unknown individual's hair was somewhat "kinky." [REDACTED] concluded by stating that he cannot be positive that [REDACTED] is identical to the unidentified individual claiming to have found part of the ransom money, however, definitely bears a very strong resemblance. [REDACTED] believed that if he could see [REDACTED] in person, he could positively state whether or not [REDACTED] is identical. [REDACTED] volunteered to travel to Seattle, Washington, for the purpose of making such an identification if necessary. [REDACTED] advised that he intends to remain as a resident of [REDACTED] at the UO through the spring term, 1973.

---

b6 b7C

---

- 2 -

---

DB Cooper-42585

Serials: PD 164-41, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.