Document date 23 November 1976AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 121 p. 185 (DB Cooper-55789), Teletype, dated 23 Nov 1976, serial SE 164-81-7799 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-121/pages/185
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FD-36 (Proposed) FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: SENSITIVITY:
[ ] Teletype [X] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET
[ ] Facsimile [ ] Priority [ ] SECRET
[ ] Airtel [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL
[ ] E F T O
[ ] CLEAR
DATE: ___________
---
PAGE THREE (164-81)
OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY.
[REDACTED] ADVISED ATTORNEY [REDACTED] OF THE ABOVE
AND THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME IT IS MORE OR LESS IN A "HOLDING"
STATUS. [REDACTED] POINTED OUT THAT, IN HIS ESTIMATION, HIS CLIENT
IS COMPLETELY RELIABLE, BUT ONLY APPEARS TO BE IN FAVOR OF
COOPERATING IF A REWARD IS AVAILABLE. [REDACTED] STATED AFTER
CONFERRING WITH HER LEGAL DEPARTMENT THAT THEY HAVE NO
COMMITMENT OR AGREEMENT WITH ATTORNEY [REDACTED] AND THAT HER
FIRM HAD NO OBJECTION TO APPRISING [REDACTED] THAT SHE HAD CON-
TACTED THE FBI AS AN ACT OF COOPERATION IN CONNECTION WITH A
MAJOR CRIME.
[REDACTED] FURTHER NOTED THAT ACCORDING TO THEIR LOCAL
OFFICE IN GREELEY, COLO., THERE IS A [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] AND ARE LOCATED AT [REDACTED]
GREELEY, COLO., TELEPHONE [REDACTED]
DENVER AT GREELEY, COLO. WILL CONDUCT IMMEDIATE INVES-
TIGATION TO VERIFY STATEMENTS BY ATTORNEY [REDACTED] AND ATTEMPT
TO IDENTIFY HIS CLIENT AS TO THE IDENTITY OF THE SUBJECT IN
THIS CASE.
POSSIBILITY OF PAYMENT BY BUREAU FOR INFORMATION LEADING
---
DB COOPER-55789
---
d: Approved: ___________ Transmitted __________ (Number) (Time) Per ___________