Part 36, page 252

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

SU 164-24

---

purchase of the land since 5/17/74. [REDACTED] was ordered [REDACTED]

---

[REDACTED] has been charged by Maricopa County authorities, Phoenix, Arizona, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and is due to go to trial on that charge in Phoenix on November 5, 1975.

---

Salt Lake City Division has [REDACTED] case against [REDACTED] concerning above mentioned [REDACTED] but USA, Salt Lake City, Utah, has held opinion in abeyance pending outcome of prosecution by Arizona authorities.

---

Kane County Attorney and Kane County Sheriff have been severely criticized in the press for not filing [REDACTED] resides in the Glen Canyon City area with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] has received much news and press coverage including National TV coverage and National publication and has "flaunted" law enforcement in Utah [REDACTED] [REDACTED] as well as being an embarrassment to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The LDS authorities have excommunicated [REDACTED] and prior to moving into the Utah area, resided in Montana with [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

---

It is noted that Phoenix Division was originator of a communication in the [REDACTED] case based on an anony- mous telephone call suggesting that [REDACTED] was residing with [REDACTED] in the Glen Canyon, Utah, area. This proved to be unfounded.

---

There appears to be nothing in the article concerning [REDACTED] which was an enclosure to referenced Phoenix airtel to Seattle to indicate that [REDACTED] is identical to D. B. COOPER. As with the anonymous caller suggesting that [REDACTED] was residing with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Salt Lake City Division feels that the anonymous caller suggesting that [REDACTED] is identical with D. B. COOPER is an attempt to cause the FBI to "hassle" [REDACTED] and any

---

- 2 - DB Cooper-13810