MemoTo SAC Seattle re suspect at Alyeska Project, Valdez, Alaska, with recommendations3 August 1977page 2 of 3
reportLegibility: medium

Part 40, page 188

DB Cooper-1583Serials SE 164-81

Document date 3 August 1977

Open in FBI Vault (Part 40, page 188 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 40 p. 188 (DB Cooper-1583), Memo, dated 3 Aug 1977, serial 164-8-7624 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-40/pages/188

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

SE 164-81 [REDACTED]

---

[REDACTED] was provided with the detailed description of the subject and he stated he thought that [REDACTED] would fit the general description as provided of the UNSUB in this case.

[REDACTED] stated that he had an address for [REDACTED] which was somewhat old: [REDACTED] Oregon, [REDACTED] telephone [REDACTED]

Following initial contact with [REDACTED] he made telephone call to persons who were mutual friends and one of those contacted said that [REDACTED] was saving coupons from cigarettes which he smoked. However, persons contacted could not remember what brand cigarettes were smoked.

---

[REDACTED] stated that while they were in Alaska a number of the personnel stationed at Valdez who knew [REDACTED] would make regular remarks about him being a prime suspect for the hijacking case. According to [REDACTED] would make remarks concerning various items which would lead one to believe that he had some information on the case. However, [REDACTED] could not remember anything specific other than the one about the Statute of Limitations running out in a short time.

---

Persons who might have additional information on [REDACTED] would be the following persons, who are still working at the Alyeska Project: [REDACTED] [REDACTED] He advised that their telephone number is [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] no longer works for the Alyeska Project. While [REDACTED] was a heavy whiskey drinker. He added that [REDACTED] is a very intelligent person who was responsible for [REDACTED]

---

A review of the procedures followed to eliminate this suspect in the first part of 1972 reflects that two Northwest employee witness did not feel photograph of [REDACTED] as identical with the subject, and two associates of [REDACTED] did not believe the artist's conception was close enough to him.

---

-2-

DB Cooper-1583