Part 44, page 293

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

FD-3 (Rev. 5-22-78)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☐ ________ ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date ________

---

PAGE TWO (SE 164-81) UNCLAS

OBTAINED A COPY OF THE POTENTIAL SUBJECT'S FINGERPRINTS FROM MICRO- FILM EMPLOYMENT RECORDS. [REDACTED] WILL PROVIDE THESE FINGERPRINTS TO THE SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ON JUNE 24, 1980. THE SEATTLE DIVISION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BUREAU LEGAL SECTION HAS AGREED TO NOTIFY [REDACTED] IF THE PRINTS DO NOT MATCH, WITHIN FIVE WORKING DAYS FOLLOW- ING THE COMPLETION OF THE FINGERPRINT COMPARISON. IF THE PRINTS ARE IDENTICAL, THE FBI WILL MAKE ADDITIONAL CONTACTS WITH [REDACTED] AND HE HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE THE FBI WITH ALL OF HIS RESEARCH DATA.

IN ORDER TO FULFILL THIS AGREEMENT WITH [REDACTED] THE LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION IS REQUESTED TO EXPEDITIOUSLY COMPARE THE PRO- VIDED FINGERPRINTS WITH THE 24 LATENT FINGERPRINTS IN CAPTIONED CASE AND TELEPHONICALLY NOTIFY SUPERVISOR [REDACTED] OR SA [REDACTED] AT SEATTLE.

SAN FRANCISCO IS REQUESTED TO EXPEDITIOUSLY FORWARD THE FINGERPRINTS FROM [REDACTED] TO THE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.

BT

---

Approved: ________ Transmitted ________ Per ________ (Number) (Time) ☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980-305-750/5402 DB Cooper-18175