Seattle to Director and San Francisco re obtaining Cooper subject's fingerprints
Document date 24 June 1980
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-44:292-293
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-44:292-293 Document: Teletype Seattle to Director and San Francisco re obtaining Cooper subject's fingerprints Id: Cooper-Part-44:292-293 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A292-293 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 44 pp. 292–293 (DB Cooper-18174–18175), Teletype, dated 24 Jun 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A292-293
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78) FBI TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: [X] Teletype [ ] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] Facsimile [XX] Priority [ ] SECRET [ ] ____________ [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] UNCLAS E F T O [X] UNCLAS Date 6/24/80 003
---
FM SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
TO DIRECTOR (164-2111) PRIORITY 2247z [illegible]
SAN FRANCISCO PRIORITY 1860z [Signature: Subject] BT
UNCLAS
ATTN: SA [REDACTED] IDENTIFICATION DIVISION, LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION;
ATTN: SA [REDACTED] SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION.
NORJAK; CAA - HIJACKING (A); OO: SEATTLE.
RE SEATTLE TELCALL TO LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION, JUNE 24, 1980.
FOR INFORMATION OF THE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION, SEATTLE HAS BEEN NEGOTIATING WITH A WRITER, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE PAST THREE WEEKS REGARDING A POTENTIAL SUBJECT OF CAPTIONED CASE. [REDACTED] BELIEVES HIS RESEARCH REGARDING "D. B. COOPER" HAS UNCOVERED THE REAL HIJACKER. [REDACTED] PLANS TO WRITE A BOOK ON THIS CASE. [REDACTED] HAS
JEM:jsh (1)
---
Approved: [Signature] Transmitted [illegible] Per [illegible] (Number) (Time) * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980-305-750/5402 DB Cooper-18174 |[illegible] 8418
FD-3 (Rev. 5-22-78)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☐ ________ ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date ________
---
PAGE TWO (SE 164-81) UNCLAS
OBTAINED A COPY OF THE POTENTIAL SUBJECT'S FINGERPRINTS FROM MICRO- FILM EMPLOYMENT RECORDS. [REDACTED] WILL PROVIDE THESE FINGERPRINTS TO THE SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ON JUNE 24, 1980. THE SEATTLE DIVISION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BUREAU LEGAL SECTION HAS AGREED TO NOTIFY [REDACTED] IF THE PRINTS DO NOT MATCH, WITHIN FIVE WORKING DAYS FOLLOW- ING THE COMPLETION OF THE FINGERPRINT COMPARISON. IF THE PRINTS ARE IDENTICAL, THE FBI WILL MAKE ADDITIONAL CONTACTS WITH [REDACTED] AND HE HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE THE FBI WITH ALL OF HIS RESEARCH DATA.
IN ORDER TO FULFILL THIS AGREEMENT WITH [REDACTED] THE LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION IS REQUESTED TO EXPEDITIOUSLY COMPARE THE PRO- VIDED FINGERPRINTS WITH THE 24 LATENT FINGERPRINTS IN CAPTIONED CASE AND TELEPHONICALLY NOTIFY SUPERVISOR [REDACTED] OR SA [REDACTED] AT SEATTLE.
SAN FRANCISCO IS REQUESTED TO EXPEDITIOUSLY FORWARD THE FINGERPRINTS FROM [REDACTED] TO THE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
BT
---
Approved: ________ Transmitted ________ Per ________ (Number) (Time) ☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980-305-750/5402 DB Cooper-18175