Seattle to Director and San Francisco re Cooper subject fingerprint comparison (copy)
Document date 24 June 1980
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-44:294-295
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-44:294-295 Document: Teletype Seattle to Director and San Francisco re Cooper subject fingerprint comparison (copy) Id: Cooper-Part-44:294-295 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A294-295 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 44 pp. 294–295 (DB Cooper-18176–18177), Teletype, dated 24 Jun 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A294-295
SE0003 1761850Z PP HQ SF DE SE P 241850Z JUN 80 FM SEATTLE (164-81) (P) TO DIRECTOR (164-2111) PRIORITY SAN FRANCISCO PRIORITY BT UNCLAS
---
ATTN: SA [REDACTED] IDENTIFICATION DIVISION, LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION; ATTN: SA [REDACTED] SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. NORJAK; CAA - HIJACKING (A); OO: SEATTLE.
---
RE SEATTLE TELCALL TO LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION, JUNE 24, 1980.
FOR INFORMATION OF THE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION, SEATTLE HAS BEEN NEGOTIATING WITH A WRITER, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE PAST THREE WEEKS REGARDING A POTENTIAL SUBJECT OF CAPTIONED CASE. [REDACTED] BELIEVES HIS RESEARCH REGARDING "D. B. COOPER" HAS UNCOVERED THE REAL HIJACKER. [REDACTED] PLANS TO WRITE A BOOK ON THIS CASE. [REDACTED] HAS
---
DB-Cooper-18176
---
[illegible signature]
PAGE TWO (SE 164-81) UNCLAS
---
OBTAINED A COPY OF THE POTENTIAL SUBJECT'S FINGERPRINTS FROM MICRO- FILM EMPLOYMENT RECORDS. [REDACTED] WILL PROVIDE THESE FINGERPRINTS TO THE SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ON JUNE 24, 1980. THE SEATTLE DIVISION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BUREAU LEGAL SECTION HAS AGREED TO NOTIFY [REDACTED] IF THE PRINTS DO NOT MATCH, WITHIN FIVE WORKING DAYS FOLLOW- ING THE COMPLETION OF THE FINGERPRINT COMPARISON. IF THE PRINTS ARE IDENTICAL, THE FBI WILL MAKE ADDITIONAL CONTACTS WITH [REDACTED] AND HE HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE THE FBI WITH ALL OF HIS RESEARCH DATA.
IN ORDER TO FULFILL THIS AGREEMENT WITH [REDACTED] THE LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION IS REQUESTED TO EXPEDITIOUSLY COMPARE THE PRO- VIDED FINGERPRINTS WITH THE 24 LATENT FINGERPRINTS IN CAPTIONED CASE AND TELEPHONICALLY NOTIFY SUPERVISOR [REDACTED] OR SA [REDACTED], AT SEATTLE.
SAN FRANCISCO IS REQUESTED TO EXPEDITIOUSLY FORWARD THE FINGERPRINTS FROM [REDACTED] TO THE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. BT
---
b6 b7C
---
DB Cooper-18177