Document date 24 June 1980AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO (SE 164-81) UNCLAS
---
OBTAINED A COPY OF THE POTENTIAL SUBJECT'S FINGERPRINTS FROM MICRO-
FILM EMPLOYMENT RECORDS. [REDACTED] WILL PROVIDE THESE FINGERPRINTS TO
THE SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ON JUNE 24, 1980. THE SEATTLE DIVISION
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BUREAU LEGAL SECTION HAS AGREED TO NOTIFY
[REDACTED] IF THE PRINTS DO NOT MATCH, WITHIN FIVE WORKING DAYS FOLLOW-
ING THE COMPLETION OF THE FINGERPRINT COMPARISON. IF THE PRINTS
ARE IDENTICAL, THE FBI WILL MAKE ADDITIONAL CONTACTS WITH [REDACTED] AND
HE HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE THE FBI WITH ALL OF HIS RESEARCH DATA.
IN ORDER TO FULFILL THIS AGREEMENT WITH [REDACTED] THE LATENT
FINGERPRINT SECTION IS REQUESTED TO EXPEDITIOUSLY COMPARE THE PRO-
VIDED FINGERPRINTS WITH THE 24 LATENT FINGERPRINTS IN CAPTIONED
CASE AND TELEPHONICALLY NOTIFY SUPERVISOR [REDACTED] OR SA
[REDACTED], AT SEATTLE.
SAN FRANCISCO IS REQUESTED TO EXPEDITIOUSLY FORWARD THE
FINGERPRINTS FROM [REDACTED] TO THE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
BT