Interview report (FD-302)Reinterview of subject at Seabeck, Washington re inconsistencies in his accountInterviewed 23 April 1972page 2 of 3
reportLegibility: medium

Part 59, page 210

DB Cooper-24353Serials SE 164-81

Interviewed 23 April 1972Dictated 23 April 1972Transcribed 23 April 1972

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 59, page 210 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 59 p. 210 (DB Cooper-24353), FD-302 interview, interviewed 23 Apr 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-59/pages/210

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

2

SE 164-81 CSS:jlb

---

then explained that if he had made such a call it was because he was "smashed."

---

[REDACTED] was then exhibited a photograph of a white male dressed in a sweater and tie with dark sunglasses standing at the corner of 5th and Pacific in Bremerton, Washington, and asked if he knew this individual. [REDACTED] upon observing this photograph stated that this picture was not of him and it was not of his father and it was not of his brother. He further stated that he did not know this individual and maintained that he did not introduce [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to this man in the photograph or to anyone else and that he did not introduce anyone to the man in this photograph.

---

[REDACTED] then stated the only time he saw [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was on Friday, during the latter part of February, exact date not recalled and that he was interviewed at length by [REDACTED] for personal background information and after a detailed and lengthy interview they ended up having dinner along with [REDACTED] at the Windjammer Restaurant in Seattle. At this point in the interview [REDACTED] was interrupted by his wife who momentarily came into the kitchen where the interview was being conducted, and she stated that they saw [REDACTED] on a Monday instead of a Friday. [REDACTED] then said this may have been so. At this point [REDACTED] was asked if [REDACTED] had paid him any money whatsoever and [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] had paid him [REDACTED] in cash for expenses incurred for this story and that this occurred on the day that he and his wife had dinner with [REDACTED] and that he had given [REDACTED] a [REDACTED] for this [REDACTED] payment. [REDACTED] then admitted telephoning [REDACTED] a number of times at the Edgewater Inn in Seattle after their interview which was on a Monday, but maintained that he never got in touch with [REDACTED] He then explained that if any of the telephone calls he made to the Edgewater Inn on the day following his interview by [REDACTED] were over three minutes in length, it was because he had [REDACTED] paged. He further stated that the reason he called [REDACTED] was to see if [REDACTED] was going to [REDACTED] and if and when he was going to meet the first down payment of [REDACTED]

---

- 70 -

DB Cooper-24353