Part 60, page 248

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

DN 87-15972 2

---

[REDACTED] further explained that [REDACTED] Grand Junction, Colorado, a [REDACTED] Rangely, Colorado, and [REDACTED].

[REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] HARTLEY [REDACTED] who resides on [REDACTED] Grand Junction, Colorado, telephone [REDACTED] and that [REDACTED] had appeared at the [REDACTED] in July or August of 1972, in possession of a [REDACTED] and said "too bad you weren't with me on this one," and displayed the [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] further stated that he had heard through the grapevine that [REDACTED] had obtained the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and that [REDACTED] had stated at one time "the guys were going to be after him, meaning [REDACTED] as he had [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] also stated that [REDACTED] a Grand Junction [REDACTED] also knows HARTLEY and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and HARTLEY at [REDACTED] Grand Junction, Colorado, in July and that several nights later, [REDACTED] had returned to the [REDACTED] to visit [REDACTED] and stated that those two men were "bums and not to mix with them."

[REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] which was supposedly [REDACTED] of [REDACTED] of Rangely, Colorado. [REDACTED] has constantly asked [REDACTED] in regards to his [REDACTED] however, [REDACTED] disclosed that [REDACTED] and who resides in Rangely, Colorado, had physically taken [REDACTED] and had returned the [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] stated at one time. [REDACTED] had approached [REDACTED] however, [REDACTED] had rejected the whole idea.

[REDACTED] Denver, Colorado, had been approached by HARTLEY and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] HARTLEY at the time of contact with the [REDACTED] stated that he had approximately [REDACTED] which HARTLEY did not

---

DB Cooper-24928