AirtelSAC Oklahoma City to SAC Seattle re Norman, Oklahoma complainant (file copy)11 December 19811 page
fbi_formLegibility: high

Part 96, page 442

DB Cooper-43394Serials 164-244, PD 164-41, PD 164-41-1866, SE 164-81

Document date 11 December 1981

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 96, page 442 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 96 p. 442 (DB Cooper-43394), Airtel, dated 11 Dec 1981, serial PD 164-41-1866 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-96/pages/442

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 12/11/81

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)

FROM: SAC, OKLAHOMA CITY (164A-244) (RUC)

NORJAK CAA - HIJACKING (A) OO: Seattle

Re Las Vegas airtel to Oklahoma City, 10/1/81.

After numerous negative attempts were made to contact [REDACTED], Norman, Oklahoma, [REDACTED] was contacted 12/7/81. She advised that [REDACTED] and anything he says should not be taken seriously. She did not feel that any of the information furnished by [REDACTED] in referenced airtel was valid.

On 12/7/81, Lt. [REDACTED], Norman Police Department, was contacted. [REDACTED] said that [REDACTED] is one of the [REDACTED] who thinks that he can not only furnish valuable information regarding all the major unsolved crimes in the U. S., but that he can solve same.

In view of the above, no contact will be made with [REDACTED].

2 - Seattle 2 - Portland (164-41) 1 - Oklahoma City [REDACTED] (5)

---

164-41-1866

---

Approved: _______________ Transmitted _______________ (Number) (Time)

DB Cooper-43394