La Mesa

City6 pages6 references

United States / California / La Mesa

5 documents, 6 including copies

AirtelSAC San Diego to SAC Seattle enclosing San Diego investigative inserts (NORJAK)22 December 1972 · San Diego · Part 73 · 3 pages · 1 of 3 pages

p. 245 · page 3 of 3La Mesa, CaliforniaPage number of the original document. Continuation of case file SD 164-91. An unnamed individual was eliminated as a suspect in the D.B. Cooper matter. On December 13, 1972, an individual at Grossm…

ReportPittsburgh investigative insert re interview of witness about suspect Chuck Whittaker8 September 1989 · Pittsburgh · Part 104 · 1 page

p. 223La Mesa, CAFBI case number and dictation identifier for the report. FBI interview report (FD-302 style) of a female witness conducted at the Pittsburgh FBI office on September 8, 1989. The witness had previous…

AirtelSAC Pittsburgh to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, with investigative insert of 9/8/89 interview19 September 1989 · Pittsburgh · Part 49 · 3 pages · 1 of 3 pages

p. 354 · page 2 of 3La Mesa, CAFBI case number and dictation initials header FBI interview conducted in Pittsburgh on September 8, 1989, of a female witness who had previously provided information to the Chicago FBI office about…

AirtelSAC Pittsburgh to SAC Seattle enclosing insert on 9/8/89 interview of witness (RUC)19 September 1989 · Pittsburgh · Part 50 · 2 pages · 1 of 2 pages

p. 148 · page 2 of 2La Mesa, CAFBI case number and typist initials header. FBI interview report from September 8, 1989 in Pittsburgh, PA. A female witness (name redacted) was interviewed about a person who resembled the D.B. Coop…

ReportInvestigative insert re San Diego suspect lead, Grossmont CollegeSan Diego · Part 114 · 2 pages · 1 of 2 pages

p. 371 · page 2 of 2La Mesa, CaliforniaPage number and FBI case file designation for San Diego field office file 164-91, dictated by agent with initials DCG. Conclusion of a prior paragraph indicating a previously discussed individual wa…

+1 copy

Part 29 pp. 184–185 · matching p. 185

Copies may differ in what was redacted.