FBI Laboratory report to SAC New York re specimens Q52-Q54 (NY Times letter)

Document date 30 October 1972

Part 9page 181 pageDB Cooper-654

Also filed at: Part 28 p. 320 · Part 60 p. 83

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Part of: FBI Laboratory report and transmittal form to SAC New York re NORJAK handwriting examination of New York Times letter · 30 October 1972 · Part 113 pp. 297–298

Open in FBI Vault (Part 9, page 18 of the PDF)

Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-09:018-018

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:018-018

Document: FBI Laboratory report to SAC New York re specimens Q52-Q54 (NY Times letter)
Id: Cooper-Part-09:018-018
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A018-018

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 p. 18 (DB Cooper-654), Report, dated 30 Oct 1972, serial SD 164-91-72 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A018-018

PagePart 9 p. 18DB Cooper-654

7-1b

REPORT of the [FBI] LABORATORY

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

To: SAC, New York (164-627) Date: October 30, 1972 FBI File No. 164-2111 Re: NORJAK Lab. No. D-721024016 LL

---

Specimens received 10/20/72

Q52 Envelope postmarked "U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, CA 920 PM 19 SEP 1972," bearing hand printed address "New York Times 229 W. 43rd New York, N.Y."

Q53 First page of two-page hand printed letter beginning [REDACTED - b6/b7C]

Q54 Second page of two-page hand printed letter beginning [REDACTED - b6/b7C]

---

Result of examination:

It was concluded that Q52 through Q54 were prepared by the writer of Q49 through Q51, submitted by Los Angeles with a communication dated 9/25/72.

It could not be determined whether the writer of Q49 through Q54 was involved in the preparation of the other specimens received in this case, because of a lack of com- parable writing and distortion in portions of the material received in this matter.

No watermarks, indented writing, or other features were found on Q52 through Q54 which would be of value in determining the source of these specimens.

The submitted evidence was photographed and will be returned separately.

---

[handwritten top right: 164-91-72 (faint/partially legible)]

SEARCHED [illegible] CHECKED SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED NOV 1 1972 WL-[LU?] [signature illegible]

b6 b7C

DB Cooper-654

Serials: 164-2111, NY 164-627, SD 164-91-72

Similar documents