FBI Laboratory report to SAC New York re specimens Q52-Q54 (NY Times letter)
This copy: Part 60 p. 83Also filed at Part 9 p. 18 (primary) · Part 28 p. 320
This copy’s own title
FBI Laboratory report to SAC New York on specimens Q52-Q54 (NY Times letter and envelope)
Document date 30 October 1972
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 9 p. 18.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-60:083-083
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-60:083-083 Document: FBI Laboratory report to SAC New York on specimens Q52-Q54 (NY Times letter and envelope) Id: Cooper-Part-60:083-083 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-60%3A083-083 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 60 p. 83 (DB Cooper-24745), Report, dated 30 Oct 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-60%3A083-083
7-1b REPORT of the LABORATORY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535
To: SAC, New York (164-627) Date: October 30, 1972 FBI File No. 164-2111 Re: NORJAK Lab. No. D-721024016 LL
---
Specimens received 10/20/72
Q52 Envelope postmarked "U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, [REDACTED] PM 19 SEP b6 1972," bearing hand printed address "New York Times 229 W. b7C 43rd New York, N.Y."
Q53 First page of two-page hand printed letter beginning [REDACTED] [REDACTED] D.B.COOPER [REDACTED] .." and ending ".. [REDACTED] b6 b7C Q54 Second page of two-page hand printed letter beginning "EVERYTHING I'VE SAID HERE IS TRUE..." and signed [REDACTED]
Result of examination:
It was concluded that Q52 through Q54 were prepared by the writer of Q49 through Q51, submitted by Los Angeles with a communication dated 9/25/72.
It could not be determined whether the writer of Q49 through Q54 was involved in the preparation of the other specimens received in this case, because of a lack of com- parable writing and distortion in portions of the material received in this matter.
No watermarks, indented writing, or other features were found on Q52 through Q54 which would be of value in determining the source of these specimens.
The submitted evidence was photographed and will be returned separately.
---
[handwritten number] 4-497-588 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ NOV 1 1972
---
DB Cooper-24745
Serials: 164-2111, NY 164-627