FBI Laboratory report to SAC New York re specimens Q52-Q54 (NY Times letter)
This copy: Part 28 p. 320Also filed at Part 9 p. 18 (primary) · Part 60 p. 83
This copy’s own title
FBI Laboratory report to SAC New York re specimens Q52-Q54, NORJAK
Document date 30 October 1972
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 9 p. 18.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-28:320-320
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-28:320-320 Document: FBI Laboratory report to SAC New York re specimens Q52-Q54, NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-28:320-320 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A320-320 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 28 p. 320 (DB Cooper-9864), Report, dated 30 Oct 1972, serial SE 164-81-4055 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A320-320
REPORT of the
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535
To: SAC, New York (164-627) Date: October 30, 1972 FBI File No. 164-2111 Re: NORJAK Lab. No. D-721024016 LL
[signature: illegible]
Specimens received 10/20/72
---
Q52 Envelope postmarked "U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, [redacted] PM 19 SEP. 1972," bearing hand printed address "New York Times, 229 W. 43rd New York, N.Y. [redacted] (order)
Q53 First page of two-page hand printed letter beginning [redacted] D.B.COOPER [redacted] " and ending b6 ".. b7C
Q54 Second page of two-page hand printed letter beginning "EVERYTHING I'VE SAID HERE IS TRUE..." and signed [redacted]
---
Result of examination:
It was concluded that Q52 through Q54 were prepared by the writer of Q49 through Q51, submitted by Los Angeles with a communication dated 9/25/72.
It could not be determined whether the writer of Q49 through Q54 was involved in the preparation of the other specimens received in this case, because of a lack of com- parable writing and distortion in portions of the material received in this matter.
No watermarks, indented writing, or other features were found on Q52 through Q54 which would be of value in determining the source of these specimens.
The submitted evidence was photographed and will be returned separately.
---
164-81-4055 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED [redacted] FILED [redacted] NOV 1 1972
DB Cooper-9864
Serials: 164-2111, NY 164-627, SE 164-81-4055
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.