SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle enclosing suspect photograph
Document date 29 December 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-09:022-022
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:022-022 Document: Airtel SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle enclosing suspect photograph Id: Cooper-Part-09:022-022 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A022-022 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 p. 22 (DB Cooper-658), Airtel, dated 29 Dec 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A022-022
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 12/29/72
SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91)
NORJAK OO: Seattle Bufile 164-2111
RE: [REDACTED b6/b7C]
---
Re Seattle airtel to San Diego dated 11/3/72.
Enclosed for Seattle is one photograph of [REDACTED b6/b7C] taken 8/25/72.
AT [REDACTED b7D] CALIFORNIA
On 12/11/72, [REDACTED b6/b7C/b7D] who has been cooperative in the past, advised upon viewing a picture of [REDACTED b6/b7C] that [REDACTED b6/b7C/b7D]
[REDACTED] further advised that [REDACTED b6/b7C] have lived at [REDACTED b6/b7C] California, for approximately [REDACTED] years. [REDACTED] advised that he would make inquiries to determine [REDACTED] November 1971.
On 12/12/72, [REDACTED b6/b7C] advised that he had determined [REDACTED b6/b7C/b7D - large block]
In view of the foregoing, [REDACTED b6/b7C] is considered not to be identical to the subject of captioned case.
---
2 - Seattle (Enc.1) (2) - San Diego T5/gar(4) [handwritten initials: aa] [guess: RK]
[Signature - illegible]
DB Cooper-658
[Stamp/reference: 104-[illegible]-76]
[REDACTED b6/b7C approving official name and title block]