Part 9, page 22

DB Cooper-658Serials 164-2111, SD 164-91, SE 164-81

Document date 29 December 1972

Open in FBI Vault (Part 9, page 22 of the PDF)

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 p. 22 (DB Cooper-658), Airtel, dated 29 Dec 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/parts/Cooper-Part-09/pages/22

Transcript

The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 12/29/72

SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91)

NORJAK OO: Seattle Bufile 164-2111

RE: [REDACTED b6/b7C]

---

Re Seattle airtel to San Diego dated 11/3/72.

Enclosed for Seattle is one photograph of [REDACTED b6/b7C] taken 8/25/72.

AT [REDACTED b7D] CALIFORNIA

On 12/11/72, [REDACTED b6/b7C/b7D] who has been cooperative in the past, advised upon viewing a picture of [REDACTED b6/b7C] that [REDACTED b6/b7C/b7D]

[REDACTED] further advised that [REDACTED b6/b7C] have lived at [REDACTED b6/b7C] California, for approximately [REDACTED] years. [REDACTED] advised that he would make inquiries to determine [REDACTED] November 1971.

On 12/12/72, [REDACTED b6/b7C] advised that he had determined [REDACTED b6/b7C/b7D - large block]

In view of the foregoing, [REDACTED b6/b7C] is considered not to be identical to the subject of captioned case.

---

2 - Seattle (Enc.1) (2) - San Diego T5/gar(4) [handwritten initials: aa] [guess: RK]

[Signature - illegible]

DB Cooper-658

[Stamp/reference: 104-[illegible]-76]

[REDACTED b6/b7C approving official name and title block]

AI notes

Commentary by the AI model that transcribed this page. It may bring in context the page itself does not state. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.

Routing header of an FBI airtel from SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle, dated 12/29/72, under the NORJAK case (D.B. Cooper). Office of Origin is Seattle, Bufile 164-2111. The RE line identifying the subject is redacted under b6/b7C exemptions. Body of airtel from SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle, responding to a prior airtel dated 11/3/72. A photograph of a redacted individual (taken 8/25/72) is enclosed. A cooperative source in California was shown the photograph on 12/11/72 and provided information. On 12/12/72 the source advised of further findings. The conclusion is that the individual viewed is not identical to D.B. Cooper, the subject of the NORJAK case. Distribution line shows two copies to Seattle (with enclosure) and two to San Diego. Typist initials T5/gar(4) with handwritten reviewer initials. Agent signature is illegible. File stamp 'DB Cooper-658' visible. A file cross-reference number partially legible as 104-[illegible]-76. Approving official name is redacted.

Extensive FOIA redactions (b6, b7C, b7D exemptions) throughout body text obscure names and personal identifiers
Underlying typed text is clear and legible where unredacted
Two dark hole-punch marks visible at top of page
Bottom right contains partially legible file reference stamp

Part 9, page 22

People

Places

Dates mentioned

Transcript