AirtelSan Diego

SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re negative fingerprint results on suspect

Document date 29 December 1975

Part 9page 571 pageDB Cooper-759

Also filed at: Part 119 p. 79

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 9, page 57 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-09:057-057

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:057-057

Document: Airtel SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re negative fingerprint results on suspect
Id: Cooper-Part-09:057-057
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A057-057

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 p. 57 (DB Cooper-759), Airtel, dated 29 Dec 1975, serial SD 164-91-103 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A057-057

People in this document

Not identified: asc (initials), TDK (typist initials)

3 mentions of people whose names are withheld or unrecorded

PagePart 9 p. 57DB Cooper-759

12/29/75

AIRTEL

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91) (RUC) SUBJECT: NORJACK (00:SE) RE: [REDACTED - b6, b7c]

---

Re Seattle airtel to the Director 10/1/75; San Diego airtel to Director 11/20/75; Identification Report dated 12/12/75.

For information of Seattle, the Identification Division of the Bureau advised on 10/17/75, that the previously reported latent prints in captioned matter were not identical with the fingerprints of [REDACTED - b6, b7c] therefore the San Diego Division is conducting no further investigation with regards to [REDACTED - b6, b7c]

On 12/12/75, The Identification Division advised that the latent prints in captioned case are not identical with fingerprints of [REDACTED - b6, b7c] The San Diego Division is therefore conducting no further investigation with regards to [REDACTED - b6, b7c]

ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

2-Seattle 1-San Diego TDK/asc (3) [illegible handwritten initials/markings]

[Signature 1 - illegible cursive] [Signature 2 - partially legible: appears to read "King K" or similar]

[Stamp: INDEXED ... FILED ...] 164-91-103 DB Cooper-759

Serials: SD 164-91, SD 164-91-103, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.