SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re negative latent fingerprint comparison
Document date 29 December 1975
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-119:312-312
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-119:312-312 Document: Airtel SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re negative latent fingerprint comparison Id: Cooper-Part-119:312-312 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A312-312 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 119 p. 312 (DB Cooper-54867), Airtel, dated 29 Dec 1975, serial SE 164-81-4744 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A312-312
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
F B I
Date: 12/29/75
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) AIRTEL Via _______________ (Precedence)
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91) (RUC) SUBJECT: NORJACK (00:SE)
RE: [redacted box] [redacted box]
---
Re Seattle airtel to the Director 10/1/75; San Diego airtel to Director 11/20/75; Identification Report dated 12/12/75.
For information of Seattle, the Identification Division of the Bureau advised on 10/17/75, that the previously reported latent prints in captioned matter were not identical with the fingerprints of [redacted box] therefore the San Diego Division is conducting no further investigation with regards to [redacted box]
On 12/12/75, The Identification Division advised that the latent prints in captioned case are not identical with fingerprints of [redacted box] The San Diego Division is therefore conducting no further investigation with regards to [redacted box]
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
(2-Seattle) (1-San Diego)
TDK/asc (3)
---
164-81-4744 [handwritten, partially legible] SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ JAN - 2 1976 [redacted box]
---
Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge
Sent _____ M Per _____
DB COOPER-54867
Serials: SD 164-91, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-4744
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.