SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re negative latent print comparisons in NORJACK

Document date 29 December 1975

Part 37page 361 pageDB Cooper-14172

Open in FBI Vault (Part 37, page 36 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-37:036-036

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-37:036-036

Document: Airtel SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re negative latent print comparisons in NORJACK
Id: Cooper-Part-37:036-036
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-37%3A036-036

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 37 p. 36 (DB Cooper-14172), Airtel, dated 29 Dec 1975, serial SE 164-81-6799 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-37%3A036-036

FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)

FBI

Date: 12/29/75

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code) AIRTEL Via ___________ (Precedence) ---------------------------------------------------

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJACK (OO:SE)

RE: [REDACTED]

Re Seattle airtel to the Director 10/1/75; San Diego airtel to Director 11/20/75; Identification Report dated 12/12/75.

For information of Seattle, the Identification Division of the Bureau advised on 10/17/75, that the previously reported latent prints in captioned matter were not identical with the fingerprints of [REDACTED] therefore the San Diego Division is conducting no further investigation with regards to [REDACTED]

On 12/12/75, The Identification Division advised that the latent prints in captioned case are not identical with fingerprints of [REDACTED] The San Diego Division is therefore conducting no further investigation with regards to [REDACTED]

ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

(2-Seattle (1-San Diego

TDK/asc (3)

164-81-6799 [STAMPS - partially legible: SEARCHED... SERIALIZED... FILED...]

[handwritten initials]

Approved: ________/s/________ Sent _____________ M Per _____________ Special Agent in Charge

DB Cooper-14172

Serials: SD 164-91, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6799

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.