Butte insert re 2/15/73 interview about D.B. Cooper hijacking discussion
This copy: Part 114 pp. 392–393Also filed at Part 30 pp. 299–300 (primary)
This copy’s own title
Butte insert by SA Roy L. Burns re Montana witness interview 2/15/73
Document date 15 February 1973
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 30 pp. 299–300.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-114:392-393
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-114:392-393 Document: Butte insert by SA Roy L. Burns re Montana witness interview 2/15/73 Id: Cooper-Part-114:392-393 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-114%3A392-393 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 114 pp. 392–393 (DB Cooper-52400–52401), Report, dated 15 Feb 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-114%3A392-393
BT #164-26 SE #164-81 RLB/cjs/mhs Page 1
---
The following investigation was conducted by SA ROY L. BURNS:
AT [__________] MONTANA
After several unsuccessful attempts, [REDACTED] was located at his residence, [REDACTED] on February 15, 1973.
On interview, [REDACTED] stated that he and an un- identified friend of his were discussing the hijacking in- volving D. B. COOPER and were trying to determine who, of all their acquaintances, would be most logical to consider as being suspect in having committed the hijacking. After dis- cussing the situation for some time, [REDACTED] and his friend decided that an individual by the name of [REDACTED] (phone- tic) would be the most logical individual. The reason they considered [REDACTED] as being a prime suspect is due to the fact that he was formerly a mercenary soldier in an unknown location, was a former [REDACTED] in Vietnam, and had done a substantial amount of propelling. [REDACTED] addi- tionally, [REDACTED].
---
In addition to the above, [REDACTED] and his friend believed that [REDACTED] would be a logical suspect due to the fact that he would simply enjoy participating in an activity of this nature. He is not particularly interested in the money, but being of the personality that he is, would enjoy just taking on the challenge of successfully effecting a hi- jacking.
[REDACTED] just feels that a hijacking is the type of thing that [REDACTED] would enjoy doing.
[REDACTED] on interview, actually knew very little about [REDACTED]. He described him as follows: [REDACTED]
---
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ [illegible] FBI - S[illegible] DB COOPER-52400 764-81- 4551
---
b6 b7C
BT #164-26 SE #164-31 RLB/cjs/mhs Page 2
---
Race White Sex Male Age Late 30s Height Approximately 6' Hair Red
---
The last time [redacted] he had a full beard.
[redacted] reportedly has not personally seen [redacted] for approximately six years. [redacted] also heard, although he cannot recall who told him, that [redacted] was in the Seattle, Washington, area at the time of the hijacking. He was last known by [redacted] to be residing in the [redacted], Montana, area and this information came to [redacted] approximately one month ago.
On February 15, 1973, [redacted] [redacted] all of [redacted] [redacted] were interviewed concerning [redacted]. None of these individuals knew [redacted] nor is the name in any way familiar to them. All three individuals stated that in the event [redacted] did any substantial amount of flying at all within the [redacted] area, they would know this individual.
Later in the day on February 15, 1973, [redacted] telephonically contacted the [redacted] Resident Agency at which time he advised that the name of the individual mentioned above, should in effect, be [redacted] rather than [redacted].
---
DB COOPER-52401
---
b6 b7C
Serials: 764-81-4551, SE 164-81-4551