Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re Rackstraw prints vs NORJAK latents
Document date 8 March 1979
Also filed at: Part 42 p. 255
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-40:408-408
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-40:408-408 Document: Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re Rackstraw prints vs NORJAK latents Id: Cooper-Part-40:408-408 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-40%3A408-408 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 40 p. 408 (DB Cooper-16036), Report, dated 8 Mar 1979 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-40%3A408-408
1-336 (Rev. 4-28-78)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537
REPORT of the LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION IDENTIFICATION DIVISION
YOUR FILE NO. 164-50 (P) March 8, 1979 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. [redacted]
TO: SAC, Sacramento
---
RE: NORJAK
REFERENCE: Airtel 2/6/79 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Sacramento SPECIMENS: Copies of finger and palm prints of Robert W. Rackstraw, FBI #977973E
The unidentified latent prints previously reported in this case are not identical with the submitted prints, which are enclosed.
Enclosures (3)
2 - Seattle (164-81)
---
[handwritten] Sub 933[illegible] 164-S1-807[illegible] SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED [illegible] MAR 1 2 1979 FBI-SEATTLE FBI/DOJ
---
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
DB Cooper-16036
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.