Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re NORJAK comparison with Rackstraw
Document date 8 March 1979
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-51:095-095
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-51:095-095 Document: Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re NORJAK comparison with Rackstraw Id: Cooper-Part-51:095-095 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-51%3A095-095 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 51 p. 95 (DB Cooper-21200), Report, dated 8 Mar 1979, serial 764-50-634 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-51%3A095-095
1-336 (Rev. 4-28-78) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION IDENTIFICATION DIVISION
---
YOUR FILE NO. 164-50 (P) March 8, 1979 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. A-45410
TO: SAC, Sacramento
---
RE: NORJAK
---
REFERENCE: Airtel 2/6/79 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Sacramento SPECIMENS: Copies of finger and palm prints of Robert W. Rackstraw, FBI #977973E
The unidentified latent prints previously reported in this case are not identical with the submitted prints, which are enclosed.
---
Enclosures (3) (1A 9 )
2 - Seattle (164-81)
---
9260 SE- 164-81 -8774
---
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DB Cooper-21200 FBI/DOJ 764-50-634
Serials: 164-2111, 764-50-634, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.