Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re Rackstraw prints vs NORJAK latents
This copy: Part 42 p. 255Also filed at Part 40 p. 408 (primary)
This copy’s own title
Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento: prints not identical with Robert W. Rackstraw
— revised to match this copy’s own text.
Document date 8 March 1979
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 40 p. 408.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-42:255-255
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-42:255-255 Document: Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento: prints not identical with Robert W. Rackstraw Id: Cooper-Part-42:255-255 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-42%3A255-255 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 42 p. 255 (DB Cooper-16985), Report, dated 8 Mar 1979, serial SD 164-91-8071 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-42%3A255-255
1-336 (Rev. 4-28-78)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537
REPORT of the LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION IDENTIFICATION DIVISION
YOUR FILE NO. 164-50 (P) March 8, 1979 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. [REDACTED]
TO: SAC, Sacramento
RE: NORJAK
---
REFERENCE: Airtel 2/6/79 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Sacramento SPECIMENS: Copies of finger and palm prints of Robert W. Rackstraw, FBI #977973E
The unidentified latent prints previously reported in this case are not identical with the submitted prints, which are enclosed.
---
Enclosures (3)
(2) - Seattle (164-81)
---
164-91 - 8071 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED ___ MAR 1 2 1979
---
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
DB Cooper-16985
Serials: 164-2111, SD 164-91-8071, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.