Insert by SA James B. Kelly re Winfield, Kansas directory check

This copy: Part 119 p. 155Also filed at Part 119 p. 144 (primary)

This copy’s own title

Insert by SA James B. Kelly re Winfield, Kansas investigation

Document date 28 October 1975

Part 119page 1551 pageDB Cooper-54647

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 119 p. 144.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 119, page 155 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-119:155-155

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-119:155-155

Document: Insert by SA James B. Kelly re Winfield, Kansas investigation
Id: Cooper-Part-119:155-155
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A155-155

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 119 p. 155 (DB Cooper-54647), Report, dated 28 Oct 1975 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A155-155

KC 164-80 JBK:ksp 1

---

The following investigation was conducted by SA JAMES B. KELLY:

AT [REDACTED] KANSAS

On October 28, 1975, a review of the [REDACTED], Kansas, City and Telephone Directories was negative for any individual named [REDACTED]. The nearest name, similar to [REDACTED] listed as employed by the U. S. Air Force.

Captain ED WINEBRENNER, Winfield, Kansas Police Department, advised that a search of the PD records was negative for any record identifiable with the name [REDACTED].

WINEBRENNER pointed out that he is acquainted with [REDACTED]. He stated that [REDACTED] is an individual that frequently misrepresents things, either intentionally or by failure to have all the facts available and that he considers [REDACTED] to be unreliable.

WINEBRENNER stated that he is not acquainted with [REDACTED] and pointed out that [REDACTED] is not listed in the current telephone directory, thus indicating that [REDACTED] has possibly moved since the City Directory was published.

---

SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ MAY 30 1976 [REDACTED - TITLE field]

---

DB COOPER-54647

Serials: KC 164-80

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.