Kansas City insert re negative directory and record checks in Kansas

This copy: Part 37 p. 176Also filed at Part 37 p. 174 (primary) · Part 37 p. 349

This copy’s own title

Kansas City insert re negative directory checks in Kansas (file copy)

Part 37page 1761 pageDB Cooper-14319

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 37 p. 174.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 37, page 176 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-37:176-176

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-37:176-176

Document: Kansas City insert re negative directory checks in Kansas (file copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-37:176-176
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-37%3A176-176

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 37 p. 176 (DB Cooper-14319), Report — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-37%3A176-176

KC 164-80 JBK:ksp 1

---

The following investigation was conducted by SA [REDACTED]

AT [REDACTED] KANSAS

On October 28, 1975, a review of the [REDACTED] Kansas, City and Telephone Directories was negative for any individual named [REDACTED] The nearest name, similar to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] listed as employed by the U. S. Air Force.

[REDACTED] Kansas Police Department, advised that a search of the PD records was negative for any record identifiable with the name [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] pointed out that he is acquainted with [REDACTED] He stated that [REDACTED] is an individual that frequently misrepresents things, either intentionally or by failure to have all the facts available and that he considers [REDACTED] to be unreliable.

[REDACTED] stated that he is not acquainted with [REDACTED] and pointed out that [REDACTED] is not listed in the current telephone directory, thus indicating that [REDACTED] has possibly moved since the City Directory was published.

---

[SERIALIZED] INDEXED...... SERIALIZED.........FILED...........

MAR 1 1976 SEATTLE

---

DB Cooper-14319

---

b6 b7C

Serials: KC 164-80

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.