Kansas City insert re negative directory and record checks in Kansas

Part 37page 1741 pageDB Cooper-14317

Also filed at: Part 37 p. 176 · Part 37 p. 349

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 37, page 174 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-37:174-174

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-37:174-174

Document: Kansas City insert re negative directory and record checks in Kansas
Id: Cooper-Part-37:174-174
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-37%3A174-174

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 37 p. 174 (DB Cooper-14317), Report — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-37%3A174-174

KC 164-80 JBK:ksp 1

---

The fo[redacted]llowing investigation was conducted by SA [redacted]

AT [redacted] KANSAS

On October 28, 1975, a review of the [redacted] Kansas, City and Telephone Directories was negative for any individual named [redacted]. The nearest name, similar to [redacted] [redacted] listed as employed by the U. S. Air Force.

[redacted] Kansas Police Department, advised that a search of the PD records was negative for any record identifiable with the name [redacted].

[redacted] pointed out that he is acquainted with [redacted]. He stated that [redacted] is an individual that frequently misrepresents things, either intentionally or by failure to have all the facts available and that he considers [redacted] to be unreliable.

[redacted] stated that he is not acquainted with [redacted] and pointed out that [redacted] is not listed in the current telephone directory, thus indicating that [redacted] has possibly moved since the City Directory was published.

---

DB Cooper-14317

Serials: KC 164-80

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.